![]() ![]() Reminder: the links below are affiliate links. For now though, it’s important to know that there isn’t a huge selection of affordable lenses, especially if you’re looking for fast primes. It is also smaller and, if you’re not bothered by the smaller APS-C sensor (which may have better performance in the end, being more recent), the R10 can be a great camera to begin with. The R10 is much more recent and employs some of the latest technology Canon has to offer: this means much faster continuous shooting speeds, a more advanced autofocus system and more advanced video capabilities. As long as you’re happy knowing all that, it certainly is a decent full frame camera for the price if you want to stay with or join the Canon RF system. For video, 4K recording is too limited, so consider it only if you want to record in Full HD. It is a shame because the autofocus is not bad, giving me good results for football and portraits. It has an old sensor and image processor, and speed-wise, it is slow, not just because of the low burst rate, but also because of the lag in the viewfinder. First, the RP was released at a time when Canon still hadn’t caught up with its mirrorless competitors. That said, if we consider the kit lens, the R10 is cheaper with the small 18-45mm.Ĭost aside, these two cameras couldn’t be more different. The similarity in price will probably be the main reason why you’re hesitating between these two cameras. The RP, being an older model, can be subject to temporary discounts or special offers. Bundles with the R10, kit lens and EF to EOS R adapter may be available depending on the region. The R10 can be bought with either the 18-45mm (29-72mm equivalent) or the 18-150mm (29-240mm equivalent). The kit lenses on offer are also different. ![]() The RP can be found for a similar price, starting at $1000, £1050 or €1100. The R10 has been launched with a retail price of $980, £900 or €1030 for the body only. The support for the RF-mount from third party manufacturers (Sigma and Tamron especially) is absent as of now, which makes the choice of lenses more restricted, unless you adapt EF-S DSLR lenses. All the other cameras, including the RP, are full frame cameras and as you can imagine, the company has concentrated on producing full frame lenses first.Īmong the full frame line-up, there are some affordable options, but also many that have a high price, and this is something important to highlight because potential buyers of the R10 might not want to spend three grand on a telephoto lens, or a fast aperture portrait lens. With the RP, you have to merge the shots in post using the Canon EOS Digital Photo Professional software, or a third-party application.Īs I wrote at the beginning, you can use the same RF lens on the R10 and RP, but there are a few things to point out.įirst, the EOS R system was launched in 2018, but only in 2022 did Canon unvail the first two APS-C cameras ( R10 and R7). Unfortunately, the RP doesn’t have this option, for reasons unknown to me.īoth cameras include focus bracketing, but only the R10 has an option to do Focus Stacking in-camera. One of my favourite settings on Canon cameras is Focus Guide, a manual focus assist that uses the Dual Pixel CMOS AF technology and gives you a level of precision that I never found on any other camera I’ve tested. This is a big difference with the R10, where the camera takes advantage of the electronic shutter for various things: increasing the drive speed to 23fps, and extending the shutter speed to 1/16000s (both cameras max out at 1/4000s with the mechanical shutter). You cannot activate it when working in Manual or Semi-Auto exposure mode. The R10 and RP don’t pack an impressive list of extra functionalities, but there are a few things I wanted to point out.įirst of all, the electronic shutter (silent mode) on the RP is only available in the Scene mode. Nevertheless, they give you an idea of which performs better. The RP can manage approximately 250 frames (LCD) or 210 frames (EVF).Īs always, remember that these figures (CIPA standard) never represent real world use, where you can easily achieve higher figures than those suggested above. The R10 can manage 430 images when using the LCD, or 260 images when using the viewfinder. The two cameras use the same battery type, the LP-E17, but their battery life rating is different. The latter is certainly what I missed the most on the RP model. The R10 has an additional AF/MF switch at the front (with a button at the centre to change AF Zone) and AF Joystick on the rear. ![]() The control layout is similar overall with two dials on top to control the exposure, and a similar number of buttons on the rear. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |